International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

Towards an Adaptive Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) for Reliable and Energy Efficient Communication in the Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT)

Author NameAuthor Details

R. Saravanan, T. Sakthivel, P. Karpagam, K. Gunasekaran

R. Saravanan[1]

T. Sakthivel[2]

P. Karpagam[3]

K. Gunasekaran[4]

[1]Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Rajalakshmi Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

[2]Firstsoft Technologies Private Limited, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

[3]Department of Computer Science, Ponnusamy Nadar College of Arts and Science, Thozhuvur, Thiruvallur, India

[4]Department of Computer Science Engineering, Panimalar Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT) is emerging as a powerful technology to explore underwater things. Reliable communication between underwater things is a significant challenge compared to communication at the surface, notably the unique characteristics imposed by the underwater environment, such as water currents, noisy scenarios, and limited resources. Several routing protocols have been suggested to overcome the challenges in IoUT. The previous works mainly focus either on improving the reliability or energy efficiency of the routing process. Concentrating on both parameters makes the routing process too complex with substantial overhead. Routing techniques face challenges in solving the noise and water current issues in the IoUT environment. The proposed work utilizes the potential of the Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) on IoUT communication by enhancing its Objective Function (OF) to resolve the routing in the underwater environment. The proposed Underwater Adaptive RPL (UA-RPL) turns the inefficient DODAG construction into an efficient under noisy environment by extending DIO message features. Numerous neighboring nodes receive the extended DIO message, and the nodes that fit into the safety zone are decided according to the multiple routing metrics, such as hop count, ETX, and Energy factor. Entire network traffic is partitioned through multiple parent nodes with the best rank values and attains an energy-balancing routing over underwater things. It helps to improve the network lifetime without compromising communication reliability. The proposed work is evaluated to show its advantages over the underwater environment. The simulation results show that the UA-RPL delivers high performance when varying the underwater things from 15 to 60. Moreover, it outperforms the existing schemes under the IoUT environment.

Index Terms

Routing Protocol

Internet of Underwater Things

Noisy Environment

Water Current

Reliability

Energy Efficiency

RPL

Reference

  1. 1.
    Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376, 2015, doi: 10.1109/comst.2015.2444095.
  2. 2.
    Qiu, Tie, Zhao Zhao, Tong Zhang, Chen Chen, and CL Philip Chen. "Underwater Internet of Things in smart ocean: System architecture and open issues." IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 4297-4307, 2019
  3. 3.
    W. Kim, H. W. Moon, and Y. J. Yoon, “Adaptive Triangular Deployment of Underwater Wireless Acoustic Sensor Network considering the Underwater Environment,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2019, pp. 1–11, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/6941907.
  4. 4.
    C.-C. Kao, Y.-S. Lin, G.-D. Wu, and C.-J. Huang, “A Comprehensive Study on the Internet of Underwater Things: Applications, Challenges, and Channel Models,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 1477, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.3390/s17071477
  5. 5.
    “RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks,” datatracker.ietf.org. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/id/draft-ietf-roll-rpl-13.html (accessed Sep. 21, 2022).
  6. 6.
    Harith Kharrufa, H. A. A. Al-Kashoash and A.H. Kemp, "RPL-based routing protocols in IoT applications: A Review", IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 19, No. 15, pp. 5952 - 5967, 2019.
  7. 7.
    Lamaazi, Hanane, and Nabil Benamar. "A comprehensive survey on enhancements and limitations of the RPL protocol: A focus on the objective function." Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 96, pp. 102001, 2020.
  8. 8.
    S. Jiang, “On Reliable Data Transfer in Underwater Acoustic Networks: A Survey From Networking Perspective,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1036–1055, 2018, doi: 10.1109/comst.2018.2793964.
  9. 9.
    Z. Zhou, B. Yao, R. Xing, L. Shu, and S. Bu, “E-CARP: An Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for UWSNs in the Internet of Underwater Things,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4072–4082, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2437904.
  10. 10.
    Darabkh, Khalid A., and Muna Al-Akhras. "RPL over Internet of Things: Challenges, Solutions, and Recommendations." IEEE International Conference on Mobile Networks and Wireless Communications (ICMNWC), pp. 1-7, 2021.
  11. 11.
    R. Diamant, P. Casari, F. Campagnaro, O. Kebkal, V. Kebkal, and M. Zorzi, “Fair and Throughput-Optimal Routing in Multimodal Underwater Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1738–1754, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1109/twc.2017.2785223.
  12. 12.
    Y. Su, R. Fan, X. Fu, and Z. Jin, “DQELR: An Adaptive Deep Q-Network-Based Energy- and Latency-Aware Routing Protocol Design for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 9091–9104, 2019, doi: 10.1109/access.2019.2891590.
  13. 13.
    S. Cai, Z. Gao, D. Yang, and N. Yao, “A network coding based protocol for reliable data transfer in underwater acoustic sensor,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1603–1609, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2013.02.001.
  14. 14.
    Pancaroglu, Doruk, and Sevil Sen. "Load balancing for RPL-based Internet of Things: A review." Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 116, pp. 102491, 2021
  15. 15.
    Lamaazi, H., El Ahmadi, A., Benamar, N., &Jara, A. J. “Of-ecf: A new optimization of the objective function for parent selection in RPL” IEEE international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications (WiMob), pp.27–32, 2019.
  16. 16.
    Kechiche, I., Bousnina, I., &Samet, A. “A novel opportunistic fuzzy logic based objective function for the routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks”,15th international wireless communications & mobile computing conference (IWCMC), pp.698–703, 2019
  17. 17.
    Mishra, S. N., Elappila, M., & Chinara, S. Eha-rpl: A composite routing technique in IoT application networks. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol.1045, pp.645–657, 2020
  18. 18.
    Al-Kashoash, H. “Congestion-aware routing protocol for 6LoWPANs”. In Sensor networks: Toward the internet of things, pp. 95–107, 2020
  19. 19.
    Eloudrhiri Hassani, Abdelhadi, Aicha Sahel, and Abdelmajid Badri. "IRH-OF: A New Objective Function for RPL Routing Protocol in IoT Applications." Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 119, No. 1, pp. 673-689, 2021
  20. 20.
    Liou, En-Cheng, Chien-Chi Kao, Ching-Hao Chang, Yi-Shan Lin, and Chun-Ju Huang. "Internet of underwater things: Challenges and routing protocols." IEEE international conference on applied system invention (ICASI), pp. 1171-1174, 2018.
  21. 21.
    Coutinho, Rodolfo WL, Azzedine Boukerche, and Antonio AF Loureiro. "A novel opportunistic power controlled routing protocol for internet of underwater things." Computer Communications, Vol.150, pp. 72-82, 2020.
  22. 22.
    Al-Bzoor, Manal, Ahmed Musa, Khawla Alzoubi, and Taha Gharaibeh. "A Directional Selective Power Routing Protocol for the Internet of Underwater Things." Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022.
  23. 23.
    Lee, Sungwon, Yonghwan Jeong, Eunbae Moon, and Dongkyun Kim. "An efficient MOP decision method using hop interval for RPL-based underwater sensor networks." Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp.1027-1041, 2017.
  24. 24.
    Z. Zhou, B. Yao, R. Xing, L. Shu, and S. Bu, “E-CARP: An Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for UWSNs in the Internet of Underwater Things,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4072–4082, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2437904.
  25. 25.
    C. Petrioli, R. Petroccia, J. R. Potter, and D. Spaccini, “The SUNSET framework for simulation, emulation and at-sea testing of underwater wireless sensor networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 34, pp. 224–238, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2014.08.012.
  26. 26.
    S. Karim, F. K. Shaikh, and B. S. Chowdhry, “Simulation-based quantitative analysis of efficient data transfer routing protocols for Internet of Underwater Things,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 121, p. 102645, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102645.
SCOPUS
SCImago Journal & Country Rank