International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

MENU
International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

An Automated Intrusion Detection and Prevention Model for Enhanced Network Security and Threat Assessment

Author NameAuthor Details

K Prabu, P Sudhakar

K Prabu[1]

P Sudhakar[2]

[1]School of Computing Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Uttar Pradesh, India.

[2]School of Computing Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Cite this Article

DOI: 10.22247/ijcna/2023/223316

Pages : 621-636

 Download PDF

1473

Views

Abstract

Amid the soaring cyber threats and security breaches, we introduce an automated intrusion detection and prevention model to bolster threat assessment and security data solutions. Our model, utilizing the state-of-the-art Automatic Intrusion Detection System (AIDS) and real-time data analysis, promptly identifies and responds to potential security breaches. It gathers security data from multiple sources, such as network traffic, system logs, user behaviour, and external threat intelligence feeds, enhancing overall cybersecurity defenses. The increasing volume of data sharing and network traffic has raised concerns about cybersecurity. To address this issue, we propose the Automatic Intrusion Detection System (AiDS) is defined as monitoring the network for suspicious activity for managing network traffic. The activities detected are monitored based on the alerts, and the operation centres are analyzed using the appropriate actions to remediate the threat. The Automatic intrusion Detection System and the Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) have been used to prevent and secure network data. By using the technique of Automatic intrusion Detection System (AiDS), the identification of the endpoint protection, which is related to the hunting engine, risk management, incident response mobile security, and access management and by using the technique of Intrusion Prevention System (AiPS) the vulnerability of threat management and the analysis of the data in the network is proposed. The result describes the 97.2% of data in the KDD 99 data set, the accuracy and sensitivity of the data from the network is 92.8%, and the system's formation. The approximate data in the database is 75%. The security services' intrusion and the system's data formation in the digital threat data have been accessed successfully.

Index Terms

Automated Intrusion Detection

Network Security

Risk Management

Endpoint Protection

Incident Response

Intrusion Prevention System

SOC-As-A Services

Vulnerability Threat Management

Mobile Security.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Khan, A. R., Kashif, M., Jhaveri, R. H., Raut, R., Saba, T., & Bahaj, S. A. (2022). Deep Learning for Intrusion Detection and Security of Internet of Things (IoT): Current Analysis, Challenges, and Possible Solutions. Security and Communication Networks, 2022.
  2. 2.
    Hyde, P., Ulianov, C., Liu, J., Banic, M., Simonovic, M., & Ristic-Durrant, D. (2022). Use cases for obstacle detection and track intrusion detection systems in the context of new generation of railway traffic management systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 236(2), 149-158.
  3. 3.
    Singh, A., Amutha, J., Nagar, J., Sharma, S., & Lee, C. C. (2022). AutoML-ID: automated machine learning model for intrusion detection using wireless sensor network. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1-14.
  4. 4.
    Echeberria-Barrio, X., Zola, F., Segurola-Gil, L., & Orduna-Urrutia, R. (2021, September). SmartWarden: Automated Intrusion Detection System for Smart Contracts. In 2021 3rd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS) (pp. 51-52). IEEE.
  5. 5.
    Pasikhani, A. M., Clark, J. A., Gope, P., & Alshahrani, A. (2021). Intrusion detection systems in RPL-based 6LoWPAN: a systematic literature review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(11), 12940-12968.
  6. 6.
    Bui, H. K., Lin, Y. D., Hwang, R. H., Lin, P. C., Nguyen, V. L., & Lai, Y. C. (2021). CREME: A toolchain of automatic dataset collection for machine learning in intrusion detection. 193, 103212.
  7. 7.
    M. Aljabri et al., "Detecting Malicious URLs Using Machine Learning Techniques: Review and Research Directions," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 121395-121417, 2022,doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022. 3222307.
  8. 8.
    Hughes, K., McLaughlin, K., & Sezer, S. (2021, July). Towards Intrusion Response Intel. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR) (pp. 337-342). IEEE.
  9. 9.
    J. Lee, J. Kim, I. Kim and K. Han, "Cyber Threat Detection Based on Artificial Neural Networks Using Event Profiles," in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 165607-165626, 2019. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953095
  10. 10.
    P. A. Legg, O. Buckley, M. Goldsmith and S. Creese, "Automated Insider Threat Detection System Using User and Role-Based Profile Assessment," in IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 503-512, June 2017. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2438442
  11. 11.
    Otapo, A. T., Saliu, L. A., Sodiq, K. A., Tokunbo-Cole, M. O., & Okia, F. U. OFFICE-AUTOMATED intrusion DETECTION SYSTEM (O-AIDS).
  12. 12.
    Hammar, K., & Stadler, R. (2021, October). Learning intrusion prevention policies through optimal stopping. In 2021 17th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM) (pp. 509-517). IEEE.
  13. 13.
    Tripathi, D., Tripathi, A. K., Singh, L. K., & Chaturvedi, A. (2022). Towards analyzing the impact of intrusion prevention and response on cyber-physical system availability: A case study of NPP. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 168, 108863.
  14. 14.
    Pani, A. K., Manohar, M., & Kumar, R. (2021). An efficient algorithmic technique for feature selection in IoT-based intrusion detection system. Indian J. Sci. Technol, 14, 76-85.
  15. 15.
    Alavizadeh, H., Alavizadeh, H., & Jang-Jaccard, J. (2022). Deep Q-Learning based Reinforcement Learning Approach for Network Intrusion Detection. Computers, 11(3), 41.
  16. 16.
    Chou, D., & Jiang, M. (2021). A survey on data-driven network intrusion detection. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(9), 1-36.
  17. 17.
    E. Anthi, L. Williams, M. S?owi?ska, G. Theodorakopoulos and P. Burnap, "A Supervised Intrusion Detection System for Smart Home IoT Devices," in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 9042-9053, Oct. 2019. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2926365
  18. 18.
    W. -C. Hong, D. -R. Huang, C. -L. Chen and J. -S. Lee, "Towards Accurate and Efficient Classification of Power System Contingencies and Cyber-Attacks Using Recurrent Neural Networks," in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 123297-123309, 2020. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007609
  19. 19.
    Mohamed, T. S., & Aydin, S. (2021). IoT-Based Intrusion Detection Systems: A Review. Smart Science, 1-18.
  20. 20.
    R. Ishibashi, K. Miyamoto, C. Han, T. Ban, T. Takahashi and J. Takeuchi, "Generating Labeled Training Datasets Towards Unified Network Intrusion Detection Systems," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 53972-53986, 2022. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3176098
  21. 21.
    Ge, M., Fu, X., Syed, N., Baig, Z., Teo, G., & Robles-Kelly, A. (2019, December). Deep learning-based intrusion detection for IoT networks. In 2019 IEEE 24th pacific rim international symposium on dependable computing (PRDC) (pp. 256-25609). IEEE.
  22. 22.
    S. Pan, T. Morris and U. Adhikari, "Developing a Hybrid Intrusion Detection System Using Data Mining for Power Systems," in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 3104-3113, Nov. 2015. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2409775
  23. 23.
    Saranya, T., Sridevi, S., Deisy, C., Chung, T. D., & Khan, M. A. (2020). Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms in intrusion detection system: a review. Procedia Computer Science, 171, 1251-1260.
  24. 24.
    Gassais, R., Ezzati-Jivan, N., Fernandez, J. M., Aloise, D., & Dagenais, M. R. (2020). Multi-level host-based intrusion detection system for Internet of things. Journal of Cloud Computing, 9, 1-16.
  25. 25.
    Nagaraja, U. Boregowda, K. Khatatneh, R. Vangipuram, R. Nuvvusetty and V. Sravan Kiran, "Similarity-Based Feature Transformation for Network Anomaly Detection," in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 39184-39196, 2020. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975716
  26. 26.
    M. Zeeshan et al., "Protocol-Based Deep Intrusion Detection for DoS and DDoS Attacks Using UNSW-NB15 and Bot-IoT Data-Sets," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 2269-2283, 2022. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3137201
  27. 27.
    Krishna, A. M., & Tyagi, A. K. (2020, February). Intrusion detection in intelligent transportation system and its applications using blockchain technology. In 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ic-ETITE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
  28. 28.
    P. Krishnamurthy, F. Khorrami, S. Schmidt and K. Wright, "Machine Learning for NetFlow Anomaly Detection With Human-Readable Annotations," in IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1885-1898, June 2021.
  29. 29.
    Rajagopal, S., Kundapur, P. P., & Hareesha, K. S. (2021). Towards effective network intrusion detection: from concept to creation on Azure cloud. IEEE Access, 9, 19723-19742.
  30. 30.
    Y. Li et al., "Automated Anomaly Detection via Curiosity-Guided Search and Self-Imitation Learning," in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 2365-2377, June (2022). doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3105636
  31. 31.
    W. Xu, J. Jang-Jaccard, A. Singh, Y. Wei and F. Sabrina, "Improving Performance of Autoencoder-Based Network Anomaly Detection on NSL-KDD Dataset," in IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 140136-140146, 2021. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3116612
  32. 32.
    J. Pacheco, V. H. Benitez, L. C. Félix-Herrán and P. Satam, "Artificial Neural Networks-Based Intrusion Detection System for Internet of Things Fog Nodes," in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 73907-73918, 2020. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988055
  33. 33.
    M. Poongodi, V. Vijayakumar, F. Al-Turjman, M. Hamdi and M. Ma, "Intrusion Prevention System for DDoS Attack on VANET With reCAPTCHA Controller Using Information Based Metrics," in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 158481-158491, 2019. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2945682
  34. 34.
    D. Vallejo-Huanga, M. Ambuludi and P. Morillo, "Empirical Exploration of Machine Learning Techniques for Detection of Anomalies Based on NIDS," in IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 772-779, May 2021. doi: 10.1109/TLA.2021.9448311
  35. 35.
    F. van Wyk, Y. Wang, A. Khojandi and N. Masoud, "Real-Time Sensor Anomaly Detection and Identification in Automated Vehicles," in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1264-1276, March 2020. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2906038
  36. 36.
    R. K. Sharma, B. Issac and H. K. Kalita, "Intrusion Detection and Response System Inspired by the Defense Mechanism of Plants," in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 52427-52439, 2019. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912114
SCOPUS
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Announcements

Archives

Downloads

Contact Us

Dr.M. Milton Joe
EverScience Publications,
Nagercoil, Tamilnadu,India

Talk to Us

+91 9442777224

Email Us

editor@ijcna.org

info@ijcna.org

info@everscience.org

Quick Links

Follow Us

Copyright © 2023; EverScience Publications

Designed & Maintained By Shiro Software Solutions