International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

MENU
International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

Differential Evolutionary Optimization Algorithm for Energy-Efficient Routing Strategy in Wireless Sensor Networks

Author NameAuthor Details

Archita Bhatnagar, Divya Bhatnagar, Tarun Kumar

Archita Bhatnagar[1]

Divya Bhatnagar[2]

Tarun Kumar[3]

[1]Computer Science Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut (U.P.), India.

[2]Department of Computer Applications, Poddar International College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

[3]Computer Science Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut (U.P.), India.

Cite this Article

DOI: 10.22247/ijcna/2025/01

Pages : 1-15

 Download PDF

113

Views

Abstract

Modern communication systems depend mostly on wireless sensor networks (WSNs), yet resource constraints and dynamic topologies cause major difficulties in energy efficiency and safe data transmission. Dealing with these problems, this work presents Exponentially-Enhanced Whale- Differential Evolution Optimisation (E-WDEO), a new routing system meant to improve network longevity and performance. The proposed model runs in two phases: first, cluster heads are chosen by a hybrid metaheuristic combining Differential Evolution (DE) and Whale Optimisation Algorithm (WOA), therefore guaranteeing best resource distribution. Then effective routing paths are found via a fitness-driven path selection technique including parameters including distance, energy, and latency. The E-WDEO model reduces the problems of high packet loss, energy depletion, and latency rather successfully. Over 1000 rounds, simulations on a 500-node network show notable performance gains including 85.2 J energy savings, 750 kbps throughput, 0.07 seconds latency, and a 9% packet loss. Compared to present techniques, the proposed approach considerably reduces computing cost and preserves 480 active nodes. These results demonstrate E-WDEO's capacity to deliver robust and efficient data transfer, hence extending the lifetime of the network. Future studies aimed at additional advancements in energy economy and Quality of Service (QoS) combine metaheuristics with deep learning approaches.

Index Terms

Wireless Sensor Networks

E-WDEO

Whale Optimization Algorithm

Differential Evolution

Energy Efficiency

Routing Protocol

Quality of Service

Network Performance

Packet Loss

Throughput

Reference

  1. 1.
    X. Xuan, J. He, P. Chai, A. E. Basabi, and G. Liu, “Kalman filter algorithm for security of network clock synchronization in wireless sensor networks,” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2022, Article ID 2766796, p. 11.
  2. 2.
    P. J. Chao, G. B. Hu, and L. T. Wan, “A novel sparse array configuration with low coarray redundancy for DOA estimation in mobile wireless sensor network,” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2021, Article ID 1362640, p. 8.
  3. 3.
    J. Wang, Y. Gao, W. Liu, A. K. Sangaiah, and H. J. Kim, “Energy efficient routing algorithm with mobile sink support for wireless sensor networks,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 7, p. 1494, 2019.
  4. 4.
    J. Wang, H. Han, H. Li, S. He, P. K. Sharma, and L. Chen, “Multiple strategies differential privacy on sparse tensor factorization for network traffic analysis in 5G,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1939-1948, 2022.
  5. 5.
    K. Vijayalakshmi and P. Anandan, “Global levy flight of cuckoo search with particle swarm optimization for effective cluster head selection in wireless sensor network,” Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 303-311, 2019.
  6. 6.
    K. Haseeb, N. Islam, A. Almogren, I. U. Din, H. N. Almajed, and N. Guizani, “Secret sharing-based energy-aware and multi-hop routing protocol for IoT based WSNs,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 79980-79988, 2019.
  7. 7.
    T. Kalidoss, L. Rajasekaran, K. Kanagasabai, G. Sannasi, and A. Kannan, “QoS aware trust-based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 1637-1658, 2020.
  8. 8.
    E. F. A. Elsmany, M. A. Omar, T. C. Wan, and A. A. Altahir, “EESRA: Energy-efficient scalable routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 96974-96983, 2019.
  9. 9.
    W. H. Ren, K. Hao, C. Li, X. Du, Y. Liu, and L. Wang, “Fuzzy probabilistic topology control algorithm for underwater wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Communications and Networks, pp. 435-444, 2019.
  10. 10.
    S. E. Pour and R. Javidan, “A new energy-aware cluster head selection for LEACH in wireless sensor networks,” IET Wireless Sensor Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 45-53, 2021.
  11. 11.
    C. X. Liu, Y. Li, W. Cheng, and G. Shi, “An improved multichannel AODV routing protocol based on Dijkstra algorithm,” in Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, pp. 547-551, 2019.
  12. 12.
    M. Abderrahim, H. Hakim, H. Boujemaa, and F. Touati, “A clustering routing based on Dijkstra algorithm for WSNs,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering, pp. 605-610, Sousse, Tunisia, 2019.
  13. 13.
    Y. L. Chen, L. Y. Jiang, and Y. R. Mu, “A LEACH-based WSN energy balance routing algorithm,” in Proceedings of the World Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 37-41, Wuhan, China, 2019.
  14. 14.
    I. Akyildiz, M. Vuran, and O. Akan, “A Cross-Layer Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” in Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, Princeton, NJ, USA, vol. 22-24, pp. 1102-1107, 2006.
  15. 15.
    M. F. Alomari, M. A. Mahmoud, and R. Ramli, “A Systematic Review on the Energy Efficiency of Dynamic Clustering in a Heterogeneous Environment of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs),” Electronics, vol. 11, pp. 1-20, 2022.
  16. 16.
    P. Nayak, S. Gupta, Surbhi, and K. Madhavi, “Routing in wireless sensor networks using machine learning techniques: Challenges and opportunities,” Measurement, vol. 178, Article ID 109205, 2021.
  17. 17.
    A. F. E. Abadi, S. A. Asghari, M. B. Marvasti, G. Abaei, M. Nabavi, and Y. Savaria, “RLBEEP: Reinforcement-learning-based energy-efficient control and routing protocol for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 44123-44135, 2022.
  18. 18.
    M. Adnan et al., “An unequally clustered multi-hop routing protocol based on fuzzy logic for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 38531-38545, 2021.
  19. 19.
    I. Adumbabu and K. Selvakumar, “Energy Efficient Routing and Dynamic Cluster Head Selection Using Enhanced Optimization Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Energies MDPI, vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 1-18, 2022.
  20. 20.
    Z. Alansari, M. Siddique, and M. W. Ashour, “FCERP: A Novel WSNs Fuzzy Clustering and Energy Efficient Routing Protocol,” Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing (AETiC), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31-42, 2022.
  21. 21.
    R. Ahmad, R. Wazirali, T. Abu-Ain, and T. A. Almohamad, “Adaptive trust-based framework for securing and reducing cost in low-cost 6LoWPAN wireless sensor networks,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 17, p. 8605, 2022.
  22. 22.
    G. Kaur, K. Jyoti, N. Mittal, V. Mittal, and R. Salgotra, “Optimized approach for localization of sensor nodes in 2D wireless sensor networks using modified learning enthusiasm-based teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm,” Algorithms, vol. 2023, no. 16, pp. 1-23, 2023.
  23. 23.
    K. SureshKumar and P. Vimala, “Energy efficient routing protocol using exponentially-ant lion whale optimization algorithm in wireless sensor networks,” Computer Networks, vol. 197, Article ID 108250, ISSN 1389-1286, 2021.
  24. 24.
    M. A. Khan, J. Khan, K. Mahmood, I. Bari, H. Ali, N. Jan, and R. M. Ghoniem, “Algorithm for increasing network lifetime in wireless sensor networks using jumping and mobile sensor nodes,” Electronics, vol. 11, Article ID 2913, pp. 1-15, 2022.
  25. 25.
    Y. Jia, G. Chen, and L. Chao, “Energy-efficient routing protocol based on cluster for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks,” Hindawi Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Article ID 5557756, p. 9, 2021.
  26. 26.
    C. Hu, X. Jiang, X. Ding, K. Fang, and X. Chou, “A high-performance energy-balanced forwarding strategy for wireless sensor networks,” Hindawi Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2022, Article ID 3058499, p. 10.
  27. 27.
    N. P. R. Kumar and J. B. Gnanadhas, “Cluster centroid-based energy efficient routing protocol for WSN-assisted IoT,” Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 296-313, 2020.
  28. 28.
    S. M. H. Daneshvar, P. A. A. Mohajer, and S. M. Mazinani, “Energy-efficient routing in WSN: A centralized cluster-based approach via grey wolf optimizer,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 170019-17003, 2019.
  29. 29.
    R. Bhardwaj and D. Kumar, “MOFPL: Multi-objective fractional particle lion algorithm for the energy-aware routing in the WSN,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 58, Article ID 101029, 2019.
  30. 30.
    H. El Alami and A. Najid, “ECH: An enhanced clustering hierarchy approach to maximize lifetime of wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 107142-107153, 2019.
  31. 31.
    T. Kalidoss, L. Rajasekaran, K. Kanagasabai, G. Sannasi, and A. Kannan, “QoS aware trust-based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 1637-1658, 2020.
  32. 32.
    S. E. Bouzid, Y. Serrestou, K. Raoof, M. Mbarki, M. N. Omri, and C. Dridi, “Wireless sensor network deployment optimisation based on coverage, connectivity and cost metrics,” International Journal of Sensor Networks, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 224-238, 2020.
  33. 33.
    M. Alharbi and E.-S. El-Kenawy, “Optimize machine learning programming algorithms for sentiment analysis in social media,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 174, pp. 38-43, 2021.
  34. 34.
    H. Sharma, A. Haque, and F. Blaabjerg, “Machine learning in wireless sensor networks for smart cities: A survey,” Electronics, vol. 10, no. 9, Article ID 1012, pp. 1-22, 2021.
  35. 35.
    R. Ashween, B. Ramakrishnan, and M. M. Joe, “Energy-efficient data gathering technique based on optimal mobile sink node selection for improved network lifetime in wireless sensor networks (WSN),” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 113, pp. 2107-2126, 2020.
  36. 36.
    B. Fatima, W. Aicha, S. Ghada, and M. Dalila, “K-means efficient energy routing protocol for maximizing vitality of WSNs,” Computational Optimization Techniques and Applications, 2021.
  37. 37.
    X. T. Huan, K. S. Kim, S. Lee, E. G. Lim, and A. Marshall, “A beaconless asymmetric energy-efficient time synchronization scheme for resource-constrained multi-hop wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 68, pp. 1716-1730, 2020.
  38. 38.
    S. Poudel, S. Moh, and J. Shen, “Residual energy-based clustering in UAV-aided wireless sensor networks for surveillance and monitoring applications,” Journal of Surveillance, Security and Safety, 2021.
  39. 39.
    X. Wu, Y. Du, and T. Fan, et al., “Threat analysis for space information network based on network security attributes: A review,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 9, pp. 3429-3468, 2022.
  40. 40.
    G. L?z?roiu, M. Andronie, M. Iatagan, M. Geam?nu, R. ?tef?nescu, and I. Dijm?rescu, “Deep learning-assisted smart process planning, robotic wireless sensor networks, and geospatial big data management algorithms in the Internet of Manufacturing Things,” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 11, no. 5, Article ID 277, 2022.
  41. 41.
    D. Prabhu, R. Alageswaran, and S. M. J. Amali, “Multiple agent-based reinforcement learning for energy efficient routing in WSN,” Wireless Networks, vol. 29, pp. 1787-1797, 2023.
  42. 42.
    J. P. Mohanty, C. Mandal, and C. Reade, “Distributed construction of minimum connected dominating set in wireless sensor network using two-hop information,” Computer Networks, vol. 123, 2017.
  43. 43.
    J. Szyd?o, D. Szpilko, J. Szyd?o, and D. Szpilko, “International student conference Industry 4.0: Human vs. Technology,” The Book of Abstracts, Article ID 10.24427/isc-iht-2019, 2019.
  44. 44.
    T. Collier and C. Taylor, “Self-organization in sensor networks,” Journal of Parallel Distributed Computing, vol. 64, pp. 866-873, 2004.
  45. 45.
    W. Nwankwo and K. Ukhurebor, “Investigating the performance of point-to-multipoint microwave connectivity across undulating landscapes during rainfall,” Landscape and Rainfall Studies, vol. 1, pp. 103-115, 2019.
  46. 46.
    R. Tiwari and R. Kumar, “Various methods of link design for transferring data in wireless sensor networks for different applications,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1020, Article ID 012006, 2021.
SCOPUS
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Announcements

Archives

Downloads

Contact Us

Dr.M. Milton Joe
EverScience Publications,
Nagercoil, Tamilnadu,India

Talk to Us

+91 9442777224

Email Us

editor@ijcna.org

info@ijcna.org

info@everscience.org

Quick Links

Follow Us

Copyright © 2023; EverScience Publications

Designed & Maintained By Shiro Software Solutions