International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

MENU
International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

Intelligent Penguin Inspiration Routing Protocol (IPIRP) for Maximizing Energy Efficiency in Internet of Things-Based Cloud Wireless Sensor Networks (IC-WSN)

Author NameAuthor Details

J. Jerlin Adaikala Sundari, G. Preethi

J. Jerlin Adaikala Sundari[1]

G. Preethi[2]

[1]Department of Computer Science, PRIST University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.

[2]Department of Computer Science, PRIST University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.

Cite this Article

DOI: 10.22247/ijcna/2025/10

Pages : 139-153

 Download PDF

99

Views

Abstract

The Intelligent Penguin Inspiration Routing Protocol (IPIRP) is proposed to maximize energy efficiency in Internet of Things-based Cloud Wireless Sensor Networks (IC-WSN). The scalability of routing algorithms becomes challenging when accommodating many sensors while maintaining efficient data transmission. Existing protocols struggle with network expansion, resulting in performance degradation and reduced efficiency. To address this issue, IPIRP introduces innovative routing strategies that scale effectively with the growing number of sensors. This includes hierarchical routing architectures, geographic-based routing algorithms, and load-balancing techniques. By dividing the network into smaller sub-networks or clusters, reducing routing overhead, and dynamically adjusting routing paths based on network conditions, IPIRP enhances scalability, reduces latency, and optimizes data transmission. This research aims to enable seamless network expansion, efficient resource utilization, and improved performance in IC-WSN for various applications, including greenhouse farming. By focusing on scalable routing solutions, IPIRP empowers users to build robust and energy-efficient monitoring systems that provide reliable data for informed decision-making and enhance the overall efficiency of IoT-based networks.

Index Terms

Cloud

Energy Efficiency

Penguin

Internet of Things

Scalability

Wireless Sensor Networks

Reference

  1. 1.
    D. Chu, Y. Long, H. Yan, and H. Chen, “Research on Load Transfer of Greenhouse Based on Blockchain,” in 2022 14th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA), 2022, pp. 957–961. doi: 10.1109/ICMTMA54903.2022.00194.
  2. 2.
    A. Sonoda, Y. Takayama, A. Sugawara, and H. Nishi, “Greenhouse Heat Map Generation with Deep Neural Network Using Limited Number of Temperature Sensors,” in IECON 2022 – 48th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2022, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/IECON49645.2022.9968606.
  3. 3.
    A. Solaimanian and R. Roshandel, “Effect of PV roof coverage on the lighting availability, heating, and cooling demands for a Venlo greenhouse in Tehran,” in 2023 8th International Conference on Technology and Energy Management (ICTEM), 2023, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICTEM56862.2023.10083896.
  4. 4.
    M. M. Abbassy and W. M. Ead, “Intelligent Greenhouse Management System,” in 2020 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), 2020, pp. 1317–1321. doi: 10.1109/ICACCS48705.2020.9074345.
  5. 5.
    P. Qu et al., “Deep learning based detection of plant nutrient deficiency symptom and design of multi-layer greenhouse system,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), 2022, pp. 641–645. doi: 10.1109/ICMA54519.2022.9856335.
  6. 6.
    A. Castañeda-Miranda and V. M. Castaño, “Smart frost control in greenhouses by neural networks models,” Comput Electron Agric, vol. 137, pp. 102–114, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.03.024.
  7. 7.
    M. Alotaibi, “Improved Blowfish Algorithm-Based Secure Routing Technique in IoT-Based WSN,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 159187–159197, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3130005.
  8. 8.
    A. S. Nandan, S. Singh, A. Malik, and R. Kumar, “A Green Data Collection & Transmission Method for IoT-Based WSN in Disaster Management,” IEEE Sens J, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 25912–25921, 2021, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3117995.
  9. 9.
    V. Agarwal, S. Tapaswi, and P. Chanak, “Intelligent Fault-Tolerance Data Routing Scheme for IoT-Enabled WSNs,” IEEE Internet Things J, vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 16332–16342, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3151501.
  10. 10.
    Q. Li, R. Sun, H. Wu, and Q. Zhang, “Parallel distributed computing based wireless sensor network anomaly data detection in IoT framework,” Cogn Syst Res, vol. 52, pp. 342–350, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.07.007.
  11. 11.
    D. Thomas, R. Shankaran, M. A. Orgun, and S. C. Mukhopadhyay, “SEC2: A Secure and Energy Efficient Barrier Coverage Scheduling for WSN-Based IoT Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 622–634, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TGCN.2021.3067606.
  12. 12.
    V. Rajasekar, P. Jayapaul, S. Krishnamoorthi, M. Saracevic, M. Elhoseny, and M. Al-Akaidi, “Enhanced WSN Routing Protocol for Internet of Things to Process Multimedia Big Data,” Wirel Pers Commun, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 2081–2100, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11277-021-08760-1.
  13. 13.
    A. Joshi, D. P. Kanungo, and R. K. Panigrahi, “WSN-Based Smart Landslide Monitoring Device,” IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, vol. 72, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3269746.
  14. 14.
    P. Tewari and S. Tripathi, “An energy efficient routing scheme in internet of things enabled WSN: neuro-fuzzy approach,” J Supercomput, vol. 79, no. 10, pp. 11134–11158, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11227-023-05091-9.
  15. 15.
    S. K. Barnwal, A. Prakash, and D. K. Yadav, “Improved African Buffalo Optimization-Based Energy Efficient Clustering Wireless Sensor Networks using Metaheuristic Routing Technique,” Wirel Pers Commun, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 1575–1596, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11277-023-10345-z.
  16. 16.
    R. Abraham and M. Vadivel, “An Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Network with Flamingo Search Algorithm Based Cluster Head Selection,” Wirel Pers Commun, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 1503–1525, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11277-023-10342-2.
  17. 17.
    A. S. J. Charles, K. Palanisamy, M. Venugopal, and S. Shanmugam, “RPL enhancement with E-Sigma routing method,” J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 7813–7826, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12652-023-04593-x.
  18. 18.
    R. Jaganathan and R. Vadivel, “Intelligent Fish Swarm Inspired Protocol (IFSIP) for Dynamic Ideal Routing in Cognitive Radio Ad-Hoc Networks,” International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1063–1074, 2021, doi: 10.12785/ijcds/100196.
  19. 19.
    A. Nazari, M. Kordabadi, R. Mohammadi, and C. Lal, “EQRSRL: an energy-aware and QoS-based routing schema using reinforcement learning in IoMT,” Wireless Networks, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11276-023-03367-9.
  20. 20.
    M. Krishnan and Y. Lim, “Reinforcement learning-based dynamic routing using mobile sink for data collection in WSNs and IoT applications,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 194, p. 103223, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103223.
  21. 21.
    A. Benelhouri, H. Idrissi-Saba, and J. Antari, “An Improved Gateway-Based Energy-Aware Multi-Hop Routing Protocol for Enhancing Lifetime and Throughput in Heterogeneous WSNs,” Simul Model Pract Theory, vol. 116, p. 102471, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2021.102471.
  22. 22.
    J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “Multi-Adaptive Routing Protocol for Internet of Things based Ad-hoc Networks,” Wirel Pers Commun, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 887–909, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11277-021-08495-z.
  23. 23.
    R. Jaganathan and V. Ramasamy, “Performance modeling of bio-inspired routing protocols in Cognitive Radio Ad Hoc Network to reduce end-to-end delay,” International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 221–231, 2019, doi: 10.22266/IJIES2019.0228.22.
  24. 24.
    J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “Improved frog leap inspired protocol (IFLIP) – for routing in cognitive radio ad hoc networks (CRAHN),” World Journal of Engineering, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 306–311, 2018, doi: 10.1108/WJE-08-2017-0260.
  25. 25.
    J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “CSIP—cuckoo search inspired protocol for routing in cognitive radio ad hoc networks,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer Verlag, 2017, pp. 145–153. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-3874-7_14.
  26. 26.
    V. Nivedhitha, A. G. Saminathan, and P. Thirumurugan, “DMEERP: A dynamic multi-hop energy efficient routing protocol for WSN,” Microprocess Microsyst, vol. 79, p. 103291, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103291.
  27. 27.
    M. Elappila, S. Chinara, and D. R. Parhi, “Survivable Path Routing in WSN for IoT applications,” Pervasive Mob Comput, vol. 43, pp. 49–63, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2017.11.004.
  28. 28.
    K. Wang, C. M. Yu, and L. C. Wang, “DORA: A Destination-Oriented Routing Algorithm for Energy-Balanced Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Internet Things J, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2080–2081, 2021, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3025039.
  29. 29.
    G. Tong, S. Zhang, W. Wang, and G. Yang, “A particle swarm optimization routing scheme for wireless sensor networks,” CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42486-022-00118-1.
SCOPUS
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Announcements

Archives

Downloads

Contact Us

Dr.M. Milton Joe
EverScience Publications,
Nagercoil, Tamilnadu,India

Talk to Us

+91 9442777224

Email Us

editor@ijcna.org

info@ijcna.org

info@everscience.org

Quick Links

Follow Us

Copyright © 2023; EverScience Publications

Designed & Maintained By Shiro Software Solutions